See what is available in Decised today, what we are committed to next, and which data sources we are still evaluating.
Last updated: 22 September 2026
UK property-area evidence briefs · version 1.1.0 · 22 September 2026
Decised creates an evidence-labelled pre-meeting brief for a UK postcode, neighbourhood or local authority, centred on property-area research for advisers.
Included
Known limitations
Property evidence is published context, often at local-authority level. Decised does not provide a valuation, yield estimate, Buy/Avoid recommendation or substitute for legal, financial or surveying advice.
Near-term commitments we are actively shaping. Timing can change as quality, licensing and feedback evolve.
Seek permission from BCC or accredited Chambers for clearly labelled regional Quarterly Economic Survey panels.
Help users understand what surveyed businesses in a region report about confidence, recruitment, sales and investment.
No QES values are included in Release 1. Ingestion starts only after written rights, consistent geography and methods, respondent-base metadata, accessibility and regression gates all pass.
Signed, expiring Workspace invitations, verified-email acceptance, pending-invite management, and clearer ownership controls based on Beta feedback.
Expand scenarios for price and volume, multiple revenue streams, seasonality, capacity, VAT, working capital, payment delays and funding schedules.
Compare multiple locations, industries or business alternatives using the same assumptions, evidence definitions and time period.
Expand location and business research into the United States using appropriate national, state and local sources.
Compare US locations using population, employment, income, industry and business evidence.
Potential sources
Coverage will vary because company-registration data is managed differently across US states.
Exploratory data sources and capabilities. These are not delivery commitments until quality, coverage and licensing are confirmed.
Evaluate Google Places, Google Business Profile data, or a suitably licensed alternative.
Add richer evidence about nearby businesses, categories, locations, opening patterns and customer feedback.
Availability depends on provider terms, licensing, cost, permitted storage and whether the data produces reliable decision evidence. Review ratings would not be treated as a measure of business quality or demand.
Add commercial asking rent, availability and occupancy evidence to improve location and fixed-cost assumptions.
VOA non-domestic stock (hereditament counts and rateable value) is already available in Property search as frozen local-authority aggregates. Asking rent, vacancy and occupancy remain out of this pack.
Add pedestrian activity, mobility and visit-pattern evidence where reliable licensed coverage is available.
Footfall is context and does not directly predict revenue.
Add aggregated consumer-spending and demand indicators to help users test whether local activity supports their revenue assumptions.
Only aggregated, privacy-safe data would be used. Individual transaction information would not be exposed.
Add licensed credit, insolvency and payment-risk evidence to improve the assessment of supplier, customer and market resilience.
This would not constitute a lending or credit decision.
Add named planning schemes, local licences and major development activity beyond the MHCLG application counts already shown in Property search.
Add public transport, road access, parking and journey-time evidence to improve physical-location comparisons.
Accessibility would not be reduced to a single unexplained score.
Allow existing businesses to compare their real performance with assumptions using explicit, permissioned connections.
Connections would require user consent, secure providers, clear data controls and the ability to disconnect and remove imported data.
Provide structured exports and carefully controlled integrations for advisers, accountants and other professional workflows.
A public API is not part of this direction unless it is separately approved.
These are areas we are evaluating rather than committed releases. We will only add them when the data is sufficiently reliable, explainable and useful.
This page describes our current direction, not a contractual delivery commitment. Priorities may change as data availability, licensing, quality, user feedback and regulatory requirements change. We will update this page when an item’s status materially changes.
